Skip to main content

Credo

“Our souls as well as our bodies are composed of individual elements which were all already present in the ranks of our ancestors. The “newness” in the individual psyche is an endlessly varied recombination of age-old components. Body and soul therefore have an intensely historical character and find no proper place in what is new, in things that have just come into being. That is to say, our ancestral components are only partly at home in such things. We are very far from having finished completely with the Middle Ages, classical antiquity, and primitivity, as our modern psyches pretend. Nevertheless, we have plunged down a cataract of progress which sweeps us on into the future with ever wilder violence the farther it takes us from our roots. Once the past has been breached, it is usually annihilated, and there is no stopping the forward motion. But it is precisely the loss of connection with the past, our uprootedness, which has given rise to the “discontents of civilization” and to such a flurry and haste that we live more in the future and its chimerical promises of a golden age than in the present, with which our whole evolutionary background has not yet caught up. We rush impetuously into novelty, driven by a mounting sense of insufficiency, dissatisfaction, and restlessness. We no longer live on what we have, but on promises, no longer in the light of the present day, but in the darkness of the future, which, we expect, will at last bring the proper sunrise. We refuse to recognize that everything better is purchased at the price of something worse; that, for example, the hope of greater freedom is canceled out by increased enslavement to the state, not to speak of the terrible perils to which the most brilliant discoveries of science expose us. The less we understand of what our fathers and forefathers sought, the less we understand ourselves, and thus we help with all our might to rob the individual of his roots and his guiding instincts, so that he becomes a particle in the mass, ruled only by what Nietzsche called “the spirit of gravity”.

Reforms by advances, that is, by new methods or gadgets, are of course impressive at first, but in the long run they are dubious and in any case dearly paid for. They by no means increase the contentment or happiness of people on the whole. Mostly, they are deceptive sweetenings of existence, like speedier communications which unpleasantly accelerate the tempo of life and leave us with less time than ever before. Omnis festinatio ex parte diaboli est – all haste is of the devil, as the old masters used to say. Reforms by retrogressions, on the other hand, are as a rule less expensive and in addition more lasting, for they return to the simpler, tried and tested ways of the past and make the sparsest use of newspapers, radio, television, and all supposedly timesaving innovations.”

(C. G. Jung, Memories, Dreams, Reflections)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Arta conceptuală

- dialog cu AI - Eu: Arta conceptuală poate fi judecată doar pentru idee sau și pentru realizare? AI: Arta conceptuală este unul dintre cele mai fascinante și dezbătute subiecte din lumea artei tocmai pentru că provoacă definiția tradițională a „operei”. Răspunsul scurt este: arta conceptuală este judecată în primul rând pentru idee, dar realizarea joacă un rol mult mai important decât pare la prima vedere. Deși pilonul central este conceptul, modul în care acesta este transpus în realitate determină succesul sau eșecul lucrării. Iată cum se împart cele două tabere în evaluarea unei lucrări conceptuale: 1. Primatul Ideii (De ce ideea este rege) În arta conceptuală, textul, schița sau pur și simplu instrucțiunile pot reprezenta lucrarea în sine. Artiști pionieri precum Sol LeWitt afirmau clar: „ Ideea devine o mașinărie care generează artă” . Valoarea intelectuală: Lucrarea este judecată în funcție de originalitatea, profunzimea sau ironia c...

Twig & Wilde

  ”It is tragic how few people ever ‘possess their souls’  before they die. ‘Nothing is more rare in any man,’  says Emerson, ‘than an act of his own.’  It is quite true.  Most people are other people. Their thoughts are some one else’s opinions, their lives a mimicry, their passions a quotation. Christ was not merely the supreme individualist, but he was the first individualist in history. People have tried to make him out an ordinary philanthropist, or ranked him as an altruist with the scientific and sentimental. But he was really neither one nor the other. Pity he has, of course, for the poor, for those who are shut up in prisons, for the lowly, for the wretched; but he has far more pity for the rich, for the hard hedonists, for those who waste their freedom in becoming slaves to things, for those who wear soft raiment and live in kings’ houses. Riches and pleasure seemed to him to be really greater tragedies than poverty or sorrow. And as for altruism, who ...

Alchemy in Reverse / Alchimia inversă

  "What a gulf between impression and expression! That’s our ironic fate—to have Shakespearean feelings and (unless by some billion-to-one chance we happen to be Shakespeare) to talk about them like automobile salesmen or teen-agers or college professors. We practice alchemy in reverse—touch gold and it turns into lead; touch the pure lyrics of experience, and they turn into the verbal equivalents of tripe and hogwash.”  - Aldous Huxley, The Genius And The Goddess But do we all have Shakespearean feelings...? , the dialogue continues in the book. What interests me now is completing a thought mentioned in the previous post—the one about Magritte, communism, and the apple. The mystery of what exists, and the mystery capitalized on / conveyed / created through artistic means. I do not crush the wonders' corolla of the world And do not kill with my mind the mysteries that I meet On my way In flowers, in eyes, on lips or graves. The light of others Strangles the spell of the unpene...